|
|
PG-13
Jul 1, 2009 3:00:37 GMT -5
Post by demoweasel on Jul 1, 2009 3:00:37 GMT -5
Oh jeez, I hate that movie so much. |
|
kishi
Experienced member
Posts: 345
|
PG-13
Jul 1, 2009 5:46:21 GMT -5
Post by kishi on Jul 1, 2009 5:46:21 GMT -5
I agree, Demo, I agree. I kind of try to push that movie into a little closet and lock it in. But the dang thing keeps squeezing out somewhere. o.O
|
|
|
|
PG-13
Jul 3, 2009 22:30:43 GMT -5
Post by KrazyRandomness on Jul 3, 2009 22:30:43 GMT -5
What is "Cool World"?
|
|
|
|
PG-13
Jul 4, 2009 3:15:31 GMT -5
Post by Fatal hilarity on Jul 4, 2009 3:15:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
PG-13
Jul 4, 2009 7:31:34 GMT -5
Post by KrazyRandomness on Jul 4, 2009 7:31:34 GMT -5
...wow. I never seen it and I don't like it. I couldn't even finish reading it. Reading it, it's kinda like they tried to make another WFRR for adults and failed....badly.
|
|
|
|
PG-13
Jul 4, 2009 13:28:35 GMT -5
Post by Fatal hilarity on Jul 4, 2009 13:28:35 GMT -5
The fact that it centers around a sexual relationship between a toon and a human is what makes it totally creepy to me. Yuck...
|
|
|
|
PG-13
Jul 4, 2009 14:07:36 GMT -5
Post by demoweasel on Jul 4, 2009 14:07:36 GMT -5
That doesn't bother me as much as the fact that it's just a really, really bad movie.
It also doesn't help that all the character designs are as ugly as can be.
|
|
|
|
PG-13
Jul 4, 2009 14:23:11 GMT -5
Post by KrazyRandomness on Jul 4, 2009 14:23:11 GMT -5
Lol! ;D
|
|
|
|
PG-13
Jul 4, 2009 15:54:31 GMT -5
Post by Fatal hilarity on Jul 4, 2009 15:54:31 GMT -5
That doesn't bother me as much as the fact that it's just a really, really bad movie. It also doesn't help that all the character designs are as ugly as can be. So you don't think a carbon-based lifeform being that intimate with an inorganic, ink-and-paint-based lifeform is at all queasy? She may look like a human, but she's made out of completely different stuff. It's like pairing a vegetable and a mineral. |
|
|
|
PG-13
Jul 4, 2009 16:06:40 GMT -5
Post by demoweasel on Jul 4, 2009 16:06:40 GMT -5
I never said it didn't bother me; all I said was that the fact that the movie was terrible was more of a detriment to itself than the creepy plot was.
|
|
kishi
Experienced member
Posts: 345
|
PG-13
Jul 4, 2009 18:21:54 GMT -5
Post by kishi on Jul 4, 2009 18:21:54 GMT -5
Dude...you don't want to know what people get up to with 'vegetables' and 'minerals'. XD
Either way, yeah. It's the whole design and everything that puts me off.
|
|
|
|
PG-13
Jul 4, 2009 19:37:33 GMT -5
Post by Fatal hilarity on Jul 4, 2009 19:37:33 GMT -5
I never said it didn't bother me; all I said was that the fact that the movie was terrible was more of a detriment to itself than the creepy plot was. I guess it must really, REALLY bad if all that overshadows it... Dude...you don't want to know what people get up to with 'vegetables' and 'minerals'. XD Too much information... XP |
|
|
|
PG-13
Jul 4, 2009 21:47:12 GMT -5
Post by demoweasel on Jul 4, 2009 21:47:12 GMT -5
It really is that bad Fatal; stay far away from it.
As far as I know, only Disney has been able to pull off the pairing of live action and animation well.
|
|
|
|
PG-13
Jul 4, 2009 21:56:32 GMT -5
Post by KrazyRandomness on Jul 4, 2009 21:56:32 GMT -5
Actually, Warner Bro. made WFRR, Disney just bought it. No clue WHY Warner Bro. sold it.
|
|
|
|
PG-13
Jul 5, 2009 0:17:40 GMT -5
Post by Fatal hilarity on Jul 5, 2009 0:17:40 GMT -5
Where did you hear that? According to the Wikipedia article on WFRR, Disney bought the movie rights to Who Censored Roger Rabbit? in '81. Warner Bros. only gave Disney the permission to use their characters.
I think something as major as that would've been on the DVD documentaries.
Personally, I think Looney Tunes: Back In Action was successful in the mix of live-action and animation, but I know some people would disagree with me.
|
|
